Track-to-Road Time Converter

Easily convert your track race times to road race equivalents!

This tool helps runners and coaches convert track performances to road race equivalents. Whether you're training for a marathon or just curious about your potential road time, this calculator provides accurate, science-backed results.

See below for more information on how the tool works and why we chose the conversion factors.







1. Why Convert Track Times to Road Times?

Track and road races are different beasts. Tracks are smoother, have consistent turns, and provide more grip. Road races, on the other hand, have varying surfaces, unpredictable terrain, and turns that disrupt pacing. That's why the same effort on a track usually results in a faster time compared to a road course. Track and road races, even when covering the same distance, yield different times due to several factors:

  • Surface Differences: Tracks are typically made of synthetic materials providing better grip and more consistent surfaces compared to varying road surfaces (asphalt, concrete, gravel).

  • Turn Dynamics: Track races involve consistent turning on a banked surface, whereas road races may have sharp turns, uneven curves, or no turns at all.

  • Terrain Variation: Road courses can be flat or hilly, which significantly impacts pacing and fatigue levels.

  • Environmental Factors: Wind exposure, temperature variations, and elevation changes on road races affect performance.

  • Pacing Strategy: Track races often allow for more consistent pacing due to lap splits, while road races are influenced by changing terrain and elevation.

2. Sources and Basis for Conversion Factors

  1. Scientific Research:

    • Studies by the Journal of Sports Sciences and International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance provide data on how environmental factors and terrain impact running economy.

    • Research on speed endurance degradation over longer distances supports the gradual increase in conversion factors for longer events.

  2. Empirical Data Analysis:

    • Analysis of performance data from elite and recreational runners, comparing their track and road race times.

    • Data collected from race results databases such as World Athletics and Marathon Guide.

  3. Coaching and Athletic Insights:

    • Insights from running coaches and professional athletes on how terrain and environment affect race pacing and fatigue.

    • Practical experience from well-known marathon coaches, including Jack Daniels and Pete Pfitzinger, who have formulated pace adjustment guidelines.

3. Breakdown of Conversion Factors

The following conversion factors were used:

Distance Flat Conversion Hilly Conversion Reasoning
1500m 1.02 1.04 Conversion to mile (1609m) + road pacing variations.
5000m 1.03 1.06 Increased fatigue on uneven terrain and turns.
10000m 1.04 1.08 Greater exposure to environmental factors and fatigue.
Half Marathon (21.1km) 1.05 1.10 Compounded fatigue and pacing disruptions on hilly terrain.
Marathon (42.2km) 1.07 1.12 Pronounced impact of fatigue, terrain, and pacing strategy over long distances.

Why These Specific Numbers?

  • The 1500m is close to a mile (~1609m), and road mile races are slightly slower due to tighter turns and terrain inconsistencies.

  • For 5000m and 10000m, studies show a 2-4% slowdown on road courses compared to track due to terrain variability and tighter corners.

  • Half Marathon and Marathon distances exhibit more significant slowdowns due to:

    • Increased exposure to environmental factors.

    • Greater pacing disruption on hilly terrains.

    • Cumulative fatigue over long distances.

These factors were modeled to increase gradually with distance, as the impact of terrain and environmental factors becomes more pronounced over time.

4. What is Considered "Flat" vs. "Hilly"?

  1. Flat Course:

    • Elevation Gain: Less than 30m (100 ft) over the entire course.

    • Course Profile: Mostly level with minor undulations.

    • Examples: Berlin Marathon, Chicago Marathon, Valencia Half Marathon.

  2. Hilly Course:

    • Elevation Gain: More than 50m (165 ft) over the course.

    • Course Profile: Includes significant climbs and descents, requiring pace adjustment.

    • Examples: Boston Marathon, New York City Marathon, San Francisco Half Marathon.

Why the Difference in Factors?

  • On flat courses, runners maintain a more consistent pace, but turns and minor undulations still cause slight slowdowns.

  • On hilly courses:

    • Uphill sections significantly increase energy expenditure and slow pace.

    • Downhill sections offer partial recovery but do not fully compensate for the time lost uphill.

    • Muscle fatigue and eccentric loading from downhill running also slow overall pace.

5. Caveats and Limitations

  • These conversions are approximations and can vary based on:

    • Individual fitness levels and running style.

    • Specific race-day conditions (weather, surface quality, etc.).

    • Pacing strategy and experience with road racing.

    • Difficulty of the course (really steep sections, frequent switch backs, long downhills, varied surfaces, etc)

  • Elite Runners may have smaller differentials due to better pacing control and race experience.

  • Recreational Runners may experience slightly larger slowdowns, especially on hilly courses.

Frequently Asked Questions